We are now advising on the possible impact of Brexit on these various areas of EU law and potential future UK regulation of these areas both in relation to UK/EU and other international trade.
International trade law has long been an area of single competence of the EU institutions, whether by virtue of participation in the World Trade Organisation or as a result of the EU’s single customs area and through application of the Community Customs Code. The EU single customs area secures that the EU’s external borders to all non EU countries apply a single set of rules to all imports from non EU countries.
Our international trade team has a wealth of experience advising EU manufacturers and non EU exporters alike on the operations of EU trade law.
The UK’s position in relation to international trade is set to change markedly in the wake of Brexit negotiations, which could possibly result in new UK competences for issues such as anti-dumping, albeit the UK would expect to apply such rules within the framework of WTO rules and obligations. This is an area we will be monitoring carefully as negotiating positions over Brexit emerge in the months and years to come.
The results are all in and it is clear the previous Conservative Party government no longer has an outright majority in Parliament with which to pursue its previous articulated Brexit agenda.
The sale of insurance products in the EU is currently regulated by the insurance mediation directive ("IMD", 2002/92/EC). The IMD applies to brokers and other insurance intermediaries.
Date: 24 January 2017
Date: 19 January 2017
Date: 16 Jan 2017
Yesterday (3 November 2016) the High Court ruled that the UK Government could not notify the European Union of its intention to leave under Article 50 of the Treaty of the European Union (“the Article 50 Notification”) without holding a vote in Parliament on the issue. The decision is subject to appeal (which wouldn’t be heard by the Supreme Court until December at the earliest), but we have set out a brief explanation of the issues raised in the case.
Paper by the Institute for Public Policy Research