We specialise in highways claims, social services claims, human rights act claims, stress at work and educational negligence claims.
Our approach is to be proactive. From day one we recognise the importance of controlling costs. That’s why we work hard to identify the chances of successfully defending a claim at the earliest stage and to adopt the appropriate strategy to achieve a swift conclusion
Our tailored, no-nonsense approach provides you with on-going benefits long after a claim is resolved, and our case management system captures a wealth of information, through which we are able to offer meaningful, analytical intelligence.
We’ll work with you to apply best practice techniques in identifying key risk management issues and setting out strategies and tactics for reducing future claims.
What amounts to a good reason to depart from budgeted costs at a detailed assessment? A recent case addresses two matters in answering this question: the role of an "underspend" and non-completion of a litigation phase.
The UK Government has announced a new public funded initiative, "Bounce Back Loans" under which small and medium-sized businesses may borrow between £2,000 and £50,000 from a list of accredited lenders. No fees or interest will need to be paid by the recipient of the loan for the first twelve months and the Government will provide a guarantee covering 100% of the loan to the lender.
As part of its £220m funding package to improve bus services in England, the Government has this week pledged £50m to support the creation of England's first all-electric bus town (or towns).
DWF has successfully restricted a claimant to fixed portal costs following a premature decision to remove the claim from the MoJ portal. Sukhjit Dhadwal, who represented the defendant Local Authority in relation to the costs issues in the claim, outlines the findings.
Caroline Sanders acted for Surrey County Council in Surrey County Council v Hillard on their successful appeal against a district judge's decision that it was in breach of s.41 Highways Act 1980, after a cyclist was injured in a closed road cycling event. The appetite of the appellate court to analyse the trial judge's approach and willingness to interfere with the judgment given the compelling evidence at hand, sends a powerful message. Caroline draws out the relevant tests and the persuasive statistical evidence.
There has been an unprecedented surge in the number of housing claims where it is alleged the property is in disrepair, resulting in extensive financial exposure to private landlords, local authorities and insurers. DWF's intelligence suggests that these types of claims are presented by a handful of solicitors and claims management companies. Denise Brosnan, Hannah Turner and Samuel Dawber take a look at the potential reasons for the rise and how local authorities can deal with this increase and help combat claims farming practices.
Gabriel Fay examines the different reasons behind the findings and comments on the potential implications of the judgment for local authorities and other landowners.
Earlier this month the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in Bellman v Northampton Recruitment Ltd (2018). Samantha Chambers and Paul Donnelly consider the implications of the judgment which continues the line of recent appellate court decisions concerning vicarious liability for physical assaults or criminal acts.
Vicarious liability has regularly been under the spotlight recently. Sheryl Bignell and Paul Donnelly look at the Court of Appeal's decision which clarifies that following repeated extensions to the doctrine of vicarious liability, such claims can no longer be defeated on the basis that the tortfeasor is an independent contractor.
Gabriel Fay reviews this sensible and useful decision for highway authorities and other landowners. In Sumner v Colborne, Denbighshire County Council and The Welsh Ministers, the Court of Appeal rejected an attempt by a motorist to impose a duty of care on the highway authority and landowner to prevent roadside vegetation from impairing visibility for road users.
In A v London Borough of Southwark, the judge found that taking part in a school sprint race was a desirable activity and whilst the claimant's collision with another pupil was unfortunate and not the Claimant’s fault, it was not reasonable to hold the local authority liable, as there was no foreseeable risk against which further precautions should have been taken.
For liability to attach to a defendant authority in tripping cases, the defect does need to be objectively considered to be dangerous. It is not sufficient for a claimant to point to the fact that they tripped to be proof of the dangerous nature of a defect.
As the authors of Local Authority Liability and legal advisors to Alarm, the public sector risk management association, we understand that managing a claim doesn’t just come down to litigation – drawing expertise from across the firm.