DWF logo


DWF logo

            Whiplash Reform Delay: What does it mean for Insurers?

            Nigel Teasdale, Head of Motor & Fraud at DWF, comments on the latest Whiplash Reform parliamentary statement:

            Date: 28/02/2020

            Nigel said "In itself, the announcement of a delay in implementation of the Civil Liability Act is perhaps one of the biggest non-news stories of recent times as it has been inevitable now for some months. The fact that the Ministry of Justice haven’t been able to even come out and confirm the delay until 26 working days before it was due to come into effect shows some of the pressures they have been under.

            Whilst we have a little bit of breathing space with a new proposed date of 1st August 2020, we still however urgently need to see the draft secondary legislation, including the proposed tariff which requires a consultation with the Lord Chief Justice, together with the proposed civil procedure rules and protocol changes in order that both sides of the industry can properly plan for implementation.
            It is disappointing that the government has not been able to commit to when those will be produced, instead of a bland assertion they will be produced "in sufficient time". Some might say that for 1st August 2020 implementation 'sufficient time' would have been 1st February 2020 and confidence based on what has happened to date, is understandably low that the 3 month hiatus will be sufficient time to tie all the loose ends.

            We now have final confirmation that Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) will not be a part of this but again there is no detail as to what the bespoke processes are that the MOJ say will be developed to enable litigants to go to court to establish liability.

            To fill the gap highlighted previously, the government has indicated that infants and protected parties will pursue their claims under the current fast track, presumably irrespective of value as most claims should be below the existing small claims limit of £1000, so that they can access legal representation under the existing cost regime. This effectively increases the 'value' of a childs' claim and insurers will have to closely monitor whether such infant passenger claims increase, and the validity of such claims."

            Related people

            Nigel Teasdale

            • Partner // Head of Motor & Fraud

            We use cookies to give you the best user experience on our website. Please let us know if you accept our use of cookies.

            Manage cookies

            Your Privacy

            When you visit any web site, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. We mainly use this information to ensure the site works as you expect it to, and to learn how we can improve the experience in the future. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalised web experience.
            Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change permissions. However, blocking some types of cookies may prevent certain site functionality from working as expected

            Functional cookies


            These cookies let you use the website and are required for the website to function as expected.

            These cookies are required

            Tracking cookies

            Anonymous cookies that help us understand the performance of our website and how we can improve the website experience for our users. Some of these may be set by third parties we trust, such as Google Analytics.

            They may also be used to personalise your experience on our website by remembering your preferences and settings.

            Marketing cookies

            These cookies are used to improve and personalise your experience with our brands. We may use these cookies to show adverts for our products, or measure the performance of our adverts.