Stanley Kamalu looks at the implications of Parkwood Leisure Limited v Laing O’Rourke Wales and West Limited, where the Court was required to determine whether a collateral warranty was a “construction contract” within the meaning of section 104 of the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996.
Read the full article on DWF's dedicated website for insurance professionals >
This information is intended as a general discussion surrounding the topics covered and is for guidance purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. DWF is not responsible for any activity undertaken based on this information.