Civil justice, costs reforms and Jackson update

In Rattan v UBS AG London Branch (2014) the Claimant agreed with the Defendant that they would exchange costs budgets by 28 February.  Having then filed their budget on 27 February, the Claimant attempted to argue that the Defendant was in default as they had filed their budget on 28 February, less than 7 days before the CMC and not in compliance with CPR r.3.13.

Read the full article on DWF's dedicated website for insurance professionals >

This information is intended as a general discussion surrounding the topics covered and is for guidance purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. DWF is not responsible for any activity undertaken based on this information.

Simon Denyer


I am the Strategic Legal Development Partner within the Insurance team.